Think about that, if 40% of the picks are losers, then you run a real risk of underperforming the market by simply not being able to get into every stock. Motley Fools releases a new recommendation every two weeks, if you’re an average investor, how could you possibly buy into each of their recommendations? Well, what happens if you miss a bunch of them? Well, from the mouths of the Motley Fool founders, 4/10 recommendations end up being losers. Typically, when they make such a claim, they take ALL of their recommendations, and run the simulation, completely ignoring the realistic expectation that an investor will only be able to follow each and every single recommendation. You see this all the time, “had you invested with us, instead of the S&P 500, then you would have done 2-3x better!”….alright sure, but let’s take a closer look at that claim. The only way to hunt down such stocks is by selecting any stock under the sun that is exhibiting an ounce of strong growth, and hope that down the line, that company becomes a behemoth in their industry. Well, you can’t have that if you focus on solid companies, with actual earnings, and staying power. Potential customers don’t want to hear that you’ve returned 225% over the course of 10 years, they want to hear about those 10,000% returns. If that happens, they now have the perfect material to attract new customers. So here is the deal, all these online services want to select the next stock that will 10x, 20x, maybe even 100x. I’ve personally been a subscriber to Motley Fools for the past year, and while the service was interesting, there was a few major flaw to their whole system: None of us are strangers to being advertised for various stock pick memberships, whether it be Zacks, Motley Fools, or Seeking Alpha. A typical Problem With Stock Picking Services The benefit you do get from using my link is that you will receive a 50% discount on your subscription price! That’s enough with that, let’s get into the review. If you felt that my review was helpful, and if you decide to sign up to Seeking Alpha Premium, then I would greatly appreciate it if you would use my link. So to help compensate for the time, I will be offering a referral link. All of that takes quite a bit of time, especially when it comes to putting together another updated review. Ever since I made this review, I’ve answered questions in the comments, as well as any direct emails I’ve received regarding this review. Yes I know…that goes against my earlier paragraph, but what I can promise you is that my opinion on the service isn’t going to change. Here we are 1.5 years later on, and I’ve been meaning to give this review another update, but this time around, I’ve also decided to include a referral link. When I originally wrote this review back on June 6, 2021, I didn’t include any referral links. The downside of this? I’m not going to make a dime from this piece of content, but the upside is that I can be brutally honest with you. I’m also going to mention that I will NOT have any affiliate links in this review, nor am I receiving any compensation from anyone for writing this review. I’ll preface this review by saying that I have only signed up to Seeking Alpha Premium yesterday, so I won’t be able to give you a straight answer today, but I will be updating this review over time. Well, that’s what we will be reviewing today. Seeking Alpha has always been a fairly good resource for information on the market, as well as tracking down your next stock idea, but with the recent addition of a paywall on most of their articles, is a Seeking Alpha Premium membership worth it? More importantly, is the “Quant Rating” feature that they seem to tout around their website an actually valuable tool?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |